Back From Red Blog Banner
Sunday, 16 September 2012 00:00

Subduing the Obstinate Executive

Rate this item
(0 votes)

image of decision makerHave you ever had a boss that simply wants to stand in your way? They avoid making even the smallest decision, never providing enough information to understand their objections. It is more common than most of us would imagine. In fact, this behavior is the central to every sales interaction. Even though you may be repulsed at thinking of yourself as "selling" to your boss, that is exactly what is required with any idea you are pushing. Therefore, it makes perfect sense to employ the same techniques used to sell large systems. If you think this is rubbish, as one of my esteemed readers once eloquently said, I will posit that you are already using sales techniques, just the wrong ones—the ones car dealers use. Changing this approach will subdue your unruly boss

The Answer Is Questions

Normally, when asking your boss to make a decision, you present him or her with a list of benefits and then you ask for a decision. This is identical to the methods of the car lot's stereotypical slimy salesperson. They list numerous features (whether they are important to you or not) and ask for the close—"Would you like me to draw up the paperwork so you can drive it home today?" That technique might work if you were buying a multifunction calculator or some new inexpensive widget for your computer, but it falls woefully short in higher stakes decisions where money, reputation, or both are on the line. Instead, decision makers want to understand the value based on the key benefits to them. In the case of the car, what might be a cool feature to the sales person (a remote control rear window sunshade), may be useless to the buyer. On the other hand, additional backseat legroom may be critical for comfortably transporting clients to lunch. A salesperson will have a much easier time selling the latter.

The simple solution is to ask your boss what is important to him or her. For these questions to be successful, they must be the right type of questions. Author Neil Rackhams' research shows that when selling any "big" items, four types of questions must be asked—situation, problem, implication, and needs-payoff. These conveniently condense to the salesy term SPIN questions.

Situation Questions

The first level of questioning is situational. These questions determine the authority of the person to make the decision, who is involved with the decision, and so forth. These are the most basic of questions, and seem too inconsequential to focus on. Although they appear to be trivial and may be annoying to answer, they have an insightful impact on the outcome of the decision. Questions in this category are similar to ones that determine whether there is a preference on make/buy or in-house or outsourcing. Assuming their answers can have a profound negative effect on the decision maker's reception to your proposal. Many of us have been in the embarrassing situation where suddenly the option of buying a COTS (common off the self) solution was the unspoken preference.

Problem Questions

Problems are in the eye of the beholder. Even though you and your boss work for the same company, each of you may identify problems very different. Problem questions elicit your boss' view of what is important. Your view of the problems is irrelevant when justifying his or her decision. To find out the decision maker's view, ask questions about specific problems and their weight on the organization. Always add the question "Are there any other big problems?" Knowing there is a problem is not enough, executives must have an explicit need for a solution. The following two sets of questions determine the explicit need based on these implicit problems.

Implication Questions

When describing problems we are intimate with, we tend to think that everyone understands the gravity of them. It is obvious to us since we have worked with them so long. We need to layout out questions that will guide others down a path of discovery so they may internalize the problems' scope. As the name implies, implication questions drill into the ramifications of the problems. They help the decision-maker comprehend the problem's consequences. For instance, if you are trying to resolve a problem with untimely production throughput reports, then implication questions could be address whether late or inaccurate reports cause:

  • Starting the wrong material.
  • Scheduling inappropriate overtime resulting in increased costs.
  • Sending people home early detrimentally reducing production throughput.
  • Missing customer deliveries.
  • Failing to identify quality issues in time to minimize rework.
  • Shipping defective product.

It is not the problems, rather the implications that arise from those issues that creates the call to arms. These questions help the listener understand the breadth of the problem and sets you up for the final set of questions—the needs-payoff questions.

Needs-Payoff Questions

The structure of needs-payoff questions shows the listener the need for your solution and the payoff. These questions, as opposed to the earlier questions (which are negative by the fact they are exploiting problems), are termed in a positive tone. Instead of saying that an implied problem is costing a certain amount, the questions take on a positive form focusing on how much they would save if an explicit problem is resolved. For instance, "Eliminating the accidental scheduling of overtime would save you how much money?" and "How much would you save in rework costs if you could catch issues a few hours earlier?" These questions provide the final piece of data that you and your decision maker need—the cost justification. If the cost savings outweigh the cost of implementing the solution, the decision becomes much easier.

Obliterating Objections

The sequence of questions has two significant benefits: 1) the cost benefits come from the decision maker, it will be difficult for them to object to the reasoning, and 2) the conversation ends on a positive assessment of the solution that directly addresses the decision maker's explicit problems.

Will some still object? Of course. In fact, some will realize that you are trying to corner them and will stop answering questions. You may need to resort to asking the questions over weeks in casual conversation and keeping meticulous notes. In the end, you will have an extremely convincing case for supporting a fact-based decision.

More in this category:
Previous post
Read 6996 times
Login to post comments

Related items

  • Retrospective Workshop

    Flier PhotoTired of doing the same thing and expecting the different results? The goal of a properly run retrospective is to do more of the good things and fewer of the bad. Even well run projects have lessons that we can learn. Preforming a retrospective on a project allows you to capture the highs and lows of a project and integrate that information into a library for others to use.

  • Project Rescue Services

    Unfortunately, you have been there: projects, programs, and sometimes entire initiatives fail. As opposed to the normal first reaction of finding someone to blame, what is needed is immediate action. Troubles in delivery are only symptoms and not the source of issue. Projects put organizations under stress. eCameron uses a fail-safe recovery plan for helping you turn around your failing projects. We carry out a fact-finding audit and root-cause analysis to create an achievable corrective action plan that helps you get your project on a new track and meet the value requirements of your stakeholders.

    For any strategic initiative, it is critical that everyone associated with the project be focused on the the projects minimal viable goals. This requires strong team interactions and open and realistic communications from the leadership to the individual contributors. We ensure that the project is completed; however, to avoid further failures the organization often needs repair, too.  We have a track record of successfully completing the most complex of projects while making improvements to the organization to prevent failures from reoccurring.

  • Capabilities Assessment Services

    Plans are nothing without the ability to implement them. People are paramount. Ninety-eight percent of the people in a company are focused on running the daily sales, marketing, manufacturing, finance, IT, product delivery, and so forth--in other words "their day job." They neither have the time and often do not have inclination to drive the implementation of a new plan. New plans require bringing in temporary staff and sometimes new full-time skills to ensure the new goals are met in a timely manner.

    Second to people, the right level of process is needed; however, too many organizations rely on process as the Holy Grail. Process needs to provide structure without bureaucracy. It must be agile enough to enable a team to quickly deliver critical capabilities yet adaptable to the inevitable adjustments as the business climates change.

    Finally, and only after people and process, the focus turns to technology. It is only a tool to make the right people and processes more effective and efficient.
    At eCameron, we live by the credo - people, process, and then technology all aligned to your strategy.

  • Program & Project Guidance

    Companies make goals to improve their products, services, and profitability. When they fail to make those goals, not only are customers, executives, and shareholders are unhappy, so are employees and vendors. Everyone has an innate pride in what they do and a desire to succeed. We help turn these situations around—preferably before they manifest into problems.

    Although our goal is to make you independent of our services, there are times when you simply need more help. Maybe it is for a high-risk project or one that is too critical to fail. We can step in and manager your project with you using our executive consultants or provide senior Project Managers through one of our partners.

  • What We Do

Rescue The Problem Project

Internationally acclaimed

Image of RPP

For a signed and personalized copy in the US visit the book's website.

Amazon logo
Flag of the United States Buy it in Canada Flag of the United Kingdom
Flag of Ireland Flag of Germany Flag of France
Flag of Italy Flag of the PRC
Flag of Japan
Book sellers worldwide.