Friday, 17 November 2017 15:35

Strategy-Execution Gaps

Rate this item
(1 Vote)

The statistics on strategy execution are dismal:

  • 59% of middle managers fail at resolving conflicts in corporate strategy.
  • 45% of middle managers cannot name one of the top five corporate goals.
  • 64% of cross department/functional issues are poorly resolved.

And maybe as you could expect from this:

  • 53% of companies cannot react timely to new opportunities.

You do not need to be a rocket scientist to know that this trajectory is not going to launch most companies’ latest strategic plans successfully. In fact, these data might make you feel that middle management would be better suited as test dummies for the next generation of manned space-vehicle. Granted, the data show there is a dearth of leadership in middle management, but executive tier has a culpable hand.

What This Tells Us

These data are the initial findings of Charles Sull, et al, from interviewing hundreds of companies to determine the problems in executing on strategy. I found the same issues while doing research for my latest book on gaps that inhibit companies from executing strategy. The data supports my premise that most organizations have gaps resulting in:

Pie charts of data

  • an absence of "common understanding,"
  • goal-project misalignment,
  • lackluster leadership,
  • ineffective governance,
  • disengaged executive sponsors, and
  • poor change management.

The only gap Sull's data does not directly support is poor change management, but when people do not know the corporate goals, it would be of no surprise that changes to achieve those goals rarely stick.

By looking at the first four pie charts in the figure, you can get a more complete picture of these data and it should be clear that the executives seem to be shirking their fiduciary duties. That leads to the last piece of data that Sull's team uncovered:

  • 64% of companies address employee performance issues poorly.

Once the problem is seen, whether the breakdown is with executives or middle managers, little is done about it. In fact, when Sull and his team took a closer look at the data the entire concept of collaboration and getting others to do the right things is lost in their reviews. They discovered individual actions are what make up most employee performance reports; collaboration generally does not have much weight. In other words, as long as my boss can see I get something done, it matters little what the team did.

No Wonder So Many Projects Struggle

This goes to the heart of what causes project failure. It transcends initiative size, an organization's experience, and project complexity. How can a project achieve company goals if neither project managers nor their bosses know what those goals are? The CEO, or a team of executives, can set the goals but they have to be translated into executable projects. Furthermore, as businesses try to adapt to business environment changes, those changes, too, must be converted into new directions for projects—even if that means canceling a project or two. If the middle tier cannot communicate either the goal or the change or make the tough decisions, projects will always struggle to be successful.

Some companies use executive sponsors to shepherd projects down this road. This is a great option. Even sponsors will struggle in this environment. Engaged executive sponsors can help address project issues, but they do little to solve the plight of functional and operational managers. Everyone has to have a clear picture of the company's goals. The only way to solve the problem is with solid leadership at the top: leadership that hires the right people and makes tough decisions. The senior executives need to be decisive and focused.

The Solution

In my research, it was clear. The issue is bigger than just saying we need better communication. It is a basic as vernacular: executives talk about execution, troops talk about implementation, executives want value delivered from a project, yet their metrics are on scope, schedule, and budget. It is in our actions: executive sponsors need to be engaged in the company's projects, yet they are too busy working on "higher priority" issues. If there are so many higher priority problems than the ones our projects are projects addressing, then our projects must be addressing the wrong problem.

Executives need to create and communicate clean concise direction. They need to engage their lieutenants in distributing those goals and spearheading the details plans to implement it. Repeatedly, we have seen that distributed leadership is more effective at driving our businesses. Before that can happen, though, senior executives need to become leaders that work on hiring the right people, cultivating employees, and creating a culture of leadership. A culture where a common understanding of the corporate direction a way of life.

Learn More

These six gaps—absence of common understanding, disengaged executive sponsors, misalignment with goals, poor change management, ineffective governance, and lackluster leadership—are explored in detail in my new book Filling Execution Gaps: How Executives and Project Managers Turn Strategy into Successful Projects available on Amazon or your favorite bookseller.

Read 946 times

Related items

  • Process Mapping

    Process is at the core of any business. It makes work predictable, repeatable, and transferable. Without it we cannot scale our businesses. However, process can be a bane to making progress. Processes that work for a $10 million company have difficulties supporting a $30 million company. Trying to scale them to a $300 million company will not only fail but not address the issues that larger companies have that were never dreamt of in a smaller organization. Processes need to be discarded, revamped, and built—all of that without creating an overburdening bureaucracy.

    Anytime you need to go someplace, you first have to know where you are. Processes are never static and your company's current state is probably far from where you think it is. Hence, the first step is mapping out you company's current state followed by defining the future state. This is more than a logical map of the process; it must also include physical maps. Whether your process is solely to provide a service (say, website development) or physical (say, manufacturing) there are logistical issues that complicate the process flow. Without fully understanding those nuances, future state processes will not reach the desired efficiencies.

    For more information about process mapping fill out the form to the left and we will get in touch with you.

  • Success vs Culture

    The other day a Latvian student contacted me for my views the connection between culture and success criteria—an important and intriguing topic. After working in Taiwan, Singapore, Korea, Japan, Israel, United States, and Canada, I wear many scars of both blatant and subtle cultural violations. I also know that within a culture one person's success is often another person's failure. So, after dispelling concerns about clicking on some random email link, I completed her survey (please feel free to take it yourself). In the process, I struck up a friendship with the student, Kristine Briežkalne, who is studying at Riga International School of Economics and Business Administration . She has some interesting views and presented me with a Venn diagram showing four frames to a project (business, client, project management, and growth perspectives) and how they intersected. As the diagram is part of her Master's thesis, I will let you ponder the how to label the overlapping areas (an eye-opening exercise).

  • Kill The White Knight

    There is a reason we do not teach classes on fixing failing projects. Many a cynic feels that we simply do not want to teach our trade, however, our reason is far nobler—we should be teaching prevention rather trying to create white knights to save the day. It is the same philosophy as building a fence at the cliff's edge rather than an emergency room at its base. Our language is replete with idioms telling us to look past the symptom and address problems at their root cause. 'An ounce of prevention versus a pound of cure' or 'a stitch in time saves nine.' Please, feel free to supply your own in the comments. Unfortunately, most of our businesses loathe this philosophy, waiting to address an issue until it is irrefutably broken.

  • Tales of an Expert Witness: Sex, Lies, and Video Tape (Part II)

    Trust relationships, certifications, and standards sound like such a safe harbor. These sound like such great words in a proposal or statement of work. How could you possibly go wrong building a trusted relationship with a customer by committing to follow a standard? In fact, this can burn you… in court.

    No one ever starts a project with the goal of ending up in court. In fact, litigation may never cross your mind; after all, you have built a trusted partner relationship. Taking a few cautionary steps, however, will make your life easier if you end up in that ill-fated litigious position. Your best chances for success come long before you enter the courtroom—even before the project starts.

  • Comparing Organizational Change Management Models

    A few weeks ago, I set out to write a post on the comparison of various organizational change management (OCM) methodologies and realized that would be a disservice to my readers. It would simply drag you down the path of implementation while failing to focus you on building the foundation. The pressure was too much and I have relented to numerous requests on making that comparison. The caveat is that juxtaposing these models is not comparing different varieties of oranges or even apples and oranges; we are surely comparing the peel to the fruit they contain. Hence, comparing methodologies like Kotter's model (the peel), Prosci's ADKAR (the core), and General Electric's Change Acceleration Process (the whole fruit) need a different approach.

More in this category: « Success vs Culture

Leave a comment

Filling Execution Gaps

Available Worldwide

Filling Exectution Gaps cover

Filling Execution Gaps is available worldwide. Below are some options.

 

PG DirectLogo
Limited Time Price $20.99
Amazon logo
Book or Kindle
Flag of the United States Canadian Flag Flag of the United Kingdom Irish Flag Deutsche Flagge
Drapeau Français Bandiera Italiana PRC flag
Japanese flag
Bandera de España
Flag of India
Bandera de México
Bandeira do Brasil
Flag of Australia
Vlag van Nederland
DeG Press Logo
Barnes and Noble Logo
Books a Million Logo
Booktopia Logo
Worldwide: Many other
book sellers worldwide.

Rescue The Problem Project

Internationally acclaimed

Image of RPP

For a signed and personalized copy in the US visit the our eCommerce website.

Amazon logo
Buy it in the United States Buy it in Canada Buy it in the United Kingdom
Buy it in Ireland Buy it in Germany Buy it in France
Buy it in Italy Buy it in the PRC
Buy it in Japan
Book sellers worldwide.

Upcoming Events

Other's References

More Info on Project Recovery

Tell me More!

Please send me more information
on fixing a failing project.

Sitemap