Sunday, 18 July 2010 00:00

Management On A Mobius Strip

Rate this item
(0 votes)

Dilbert's Boss' Visionary Leadership, Dilbert © September 9, 1999, United Feature Syndicate, Inc.

The two most common project attributes that raise the red flag are cost and timeline problems. Both are easily measured and inextricable intertwined. As the timeline extends, there is a commensurate increase in cost; similarly, as cost goes up (usually from increased scope) the timeline increases. However, time is different. Benjamin Franklin said it best, "You may delay, but time will not." Work can stop work (controlling the burn rate) and extraneous features can be removed (decreasing the required work), but time marches on. We cannot control time. Although intuitively obvious, the concept seems to escape a large number of managers and executives.

Scheduling on Trouble Projects

From years of experience investigating troubled projects, the timeline is often the entire problem. Auditing the schedule starts by looking at the parameters used to build it. Three primary methods are used to build a schedule:

  1. Backward pass: start with the end date and build the schedule backwards to arrive at the start date.
  2. Forward pass: begin with a projected start date and add tasks to determine the end date.
  3. The squeeze method: set an end date and change durations and dependencies until the project fits in the time allowed.

The first two are sensible ways to build a schedule. All too often, though, the third option is used. The latter builds an unrealistic schedule. Assuming task duration estimates are correct, the only way to squeeze projects reliably into a timeline is to change the methodology, remove scope, or, most likely, a mixture of both. Simply making it fit is a common problem with a project manager who wants to please upper management that has unrealistic expectations.

When a project must meet a specific date, the primary triple constraint is obvious—the schedule—scope, budget, or both must suffer. Contrary to popular belief, money does not solve everything, so scope must be cut until a forward built schedule achieves meeting the required end date.

Case Study: Starting a Project Red

More than once I have been asked to work on projects that are red, only to find they have not been started properly. On one in particular, I was close enough to watch the situation as it slowly drifted toward the crimson end of the spectrum; and, too distant to correct the situation.

This project was a small part of a much larger program. The program had a twelve-month delivery schedule and the date was immutable—specific government regulations required the system be in place on a specific date. The project in question was initiated on the date the program started; however, there was significant confusion on how to utilize a large software vendor. Besides selling software, this vendor also had a systems integration (SI) division that could help with the implementation. The client wanted to contract the SI group on a fixed-price contract and the vendor wanted to use a time-and-materials model. The internal debate on whether to use the SI and negotiations on the Statement of Work took six months of the allotted year.

To make the project fit, numerous compromises were struck with the customer and one of the three software packages from the vendor was only partially deployed. Because of the compromises, the customer had to implement dozens of labor-intensive processes. Nonetheless, the government requirements were met and the project was considered a success. The complete functionality was deployed nearly eight months after the initial deadline. The cost to the company was huge, but paled in comparison to the hundreds of millions of dollars in new revenue.

Even when all the tasks fit into the timeline, some schedules are better than others. Ensure that high-risk tasks are scheduled as early as possible. Front-loading risk provides reaction time. If trouble arises, often scope items can be changed, re-scheduled, or removed to compensate and hold the original schedule.

Thinking that it is all going to fit somehow is unrealistic and sets the project up for future issues.

When a Due Date Cannot Change

Projects with absolute time constraints are abundant. To name a few, they may be related to tax cycles, school sessions, elections, census data, or government regulations. Missing the deadline by days may postpone the project's usefulness by years. Consider what would happen if one of the multiple U.S. personal tax programs used by millions of people was delayed until March, when taxes are due April 15. The impact would be devastating to the business. In these cases, the cost of a delay is so large that everything else is subordinate to the release date. Canceling the project is not an option, as that would be tantamount to closing the doors on the business. There is really only one option—reduce scope.

Reducing scope does not require removing any item; it may simply mean delivering some functionality later. Segmenting the deliverables to provide the core requirements on time and other less important functions later, may solve the problem. As an example, the tax programs mentioned above all deliver the core program by the end of the year, however, during the first few months of the year they provide updates for last minute changes in the tax laws. If there are forms that are not complete, the program warns the taxpayer telling them to wait to submit them. Most taxpayers are able to submit taxes as soon as their W2s arrive, others must wait for the final tested forms.

A similar option is to phase the project. Phasing divides deliverables into sets of prioritized features. The most needed features are deployed first and others are delivered later. Configuration of the packages is highly dependent on the specifics of the project and usually requires significant negotiation with the customer and the end users. For example, if a project is supposed to acquire data on sales to allow managers to see trends, data are needed prior to reporting. It could take months of collection before enough data are available to generate meaningful reports. Many customers will be upset not being able to report on the data as soon as the system goes live, however this option is better than losing months of critical data waiting for reports to be completely designed and approved.

Read 45811 times

Related items

  • People vs Process Track Session/Keynote Example

    If you want educational keynote many of our presentations can be keynotes or track sessions. In the example below, the presentation People or Process: Which Impacts Project Success More? is given as a track session.  

    Example People vs Process keynote as a track session

    This session was given at the PMI Sioux Empire Professions Development Day help in Sioux Falls SD on September 9, 2014.

  • Visualizing Change Example

    Visualizing Change presentations have the impact of physicalizing inanimate objects and events. They are fun and involve many of the people in the workshop or presentation. In general, it is easy to get people interested in attending since mentioning that there are rope, chains, whips and blindfolds have a tendency to pique people's interest. But don't worry, as you will see from the video, this is a child-friendly event. The props physicalize constraints, chains of command, slave drivers, ignorance, and the like.

    Many discussions are held ahead of the event to ensure that the correct issues are addressed. This presentation can model nearly any problem or change by helping define the current and future states in a very jocular and interactive manner.

    Visualizing change presentations and workshops cannot be done online.

    Visualizing Change Example
  • What Would You Do? Presentation Example

    The What Would You Do? series of presentations have two goals: 1) educate the audience, and 2) get them involved with developing an answer. They are built on the premise that any audience has a wealth of knowledge and that we need to get away from the talking-head and engage the attendees. The example below is the presentation $305 Million Failure (At the time of this presentation, since it was still in litigation, it was only a $250 Million Failure). There are also ready-made presentations on sponsorship, ethics, and change management. If there is another topic you would like to see, please let us know.

    What Would You Do? example ($305 Million Failure)
  • Vision to Value Track Session/Keynote Example

    If you want educational keynote many of our presentations can be keynotes or track sessions. In the example below, the presentationVision to Value: Executing Strategically Focused Initiatives is given as a track session. This video shows the flexibility to work with the audience in ways that generally cannot be done in keynotes.  

    Example Vision to Value keynote as a track session

    This session was given at the 2014 Instant impact Conference hosted by PMI Olympia on September 5, 2014. It was given twice that day. This is the afternoon session.

  • Filling Execution Gaps: How Executives and Project Managers Turn Corporate Strategy into Successful Projects
    What Filling Execution Gaps Covers

    Filling Execution Gaps

    by Todd C. Williams
    ISBN: 978-1-5015-0640-6
    De G Press (DeGruyter), September 2017

    Project alignment, executive sponsorship, change management, governance, leadership, and common understanding. These six business issues are topics of daily discussions between executives, middle management, and project managers; they are the pivotal problems plaguing transformational leadership. Any one of these six, when improperly addressed, will hex a project's chances for success. And, they do—daily—destroying the ability companies to turn vision into value.

    Check it out on Amazon or the Filling Execution Gaps website

    Without the foundation of a common understanding of goals and core concepts, such as value being critical to success, communication stops and projects fail.

    Without change management, users fail to adopt project deliverables, value is lost, and projects fail.

    Without maintaining alignment between corporate goals and projects, projects miss their value targets and projects fail.

    Without an engaged executive sponsor, scope increases, goals drift, chaos reigns, value is lost, and projects fail.

    Without enough governance, critical connections are not made, steps are ignored, value is overlooked, and projects fail.

    Too much governance slows progress, companies cannot respond to business pressures, value drowns in bureaucracy, and projects fail.

    Without strong leadership defining the vision and value, goals are not set, essential relationships do not form, teams do not develop, essential decisions are not made, and projects fail.

Leave a comment

Filling Execution Gaps

Available Worldwide

Filling Exectution Gaps cover

Filling Execution Gaps is available worldwide. Below are some options.


PG DirectLogo
Limited Time Price $20.99
Amazon logo
Book or Kindle
Flag of the United States Canadian Flag Flag of the United Kingdom Irish Flag Deutsche Flagge
Drapeau Français Bandiera Italiana PRC flag
Japanese flag
Bandera de España
Flag of India
Bandera de México
Bandeira do Brasil
Flag of Australia
Vlag van Nederland
DeG Press Logo
Barnes and Noble Logo
Books a Million Logo
Booktopia Logo
Worldwide: Many other
book sellers worldwide.

Rescue The Problem Project

Internationally acclaimed

Image of RPP

For a signed and personalized copy in the US visit the our eCommerce website.

Amazon logo
Buy it in the United States Buy it in Canada Buy it in the United Kingdom
Buy it in Ireland Buy it in Germany Buy it in France
Buy it in Italy Buy it in the PRC
Buy it in Japan
Book sellers worldwide.

Upcoming Events

Other's References

More Info on Project Recovery

Tell me More!

Please send me more information
on fixing a failing project.