Sunday, 26 September 2010 00:00

Loyalty: The Ever Changing Company-Employee Relationship

Rate this item
(0 votes)

Loyalty. I have heard a lot about loyalty lately. It focuses on a company's loyalty to their employees. The current stormy economic condition means layoffs and employees on both sides of the pink slip are unsettled. Albeit, conditions today bare a stronger semblance to a hurricane stalled over the employment sector, while Wall Street seems to be holding its own, when the floodwaters subside both employees and employers will be on more fertile ground. As opposed to straining loyalty to its breaking point, it is only taking on a new form.

Goal Based Loyalty

The last thirty years have seen the demise of the typewriter, secretary, interoffice memorandum, mail, and pensions. This has affected the role of employees more than any other thirty-year period. Hence, even in my working career, the office space has been transformed from smoke filled conference rooms with men who had worked for the same company for their thirty years, to online meetings with avatars. The company provides me with a laptop, assumes I have an Internet connection, I manage my retirement funds, and half of my co-workers are contractors. Many would say that company loyalty is gone.

However, the other day when visiting a company where, after stepping over the rubber chicken just inside the front door, I saw piles of toddler toys and there were just as many ExerSaucers as there were employees at their desks. An hour later, when I left, a bull terrier escorted me to the door. Today employees (and contractors) can work from home, take kids to the office, and communicate in 140 characters or less at the speed of the Internet. Their goals are different. Those of their companies' are too.

The difference is that today loyalty is goal based. By definition, this makes the loyalty time dependent—goals change to meet the demands of the environment. Businesses needing to enter a new market shift their loyalty to the resources that share those goals. Employees that do not make that shift, lose out on the loyalty. Likewise, employees that develop new goals that are not inline with the company's should move on to new opportunities; the association becomes impotent. It is in the best interests of all parties so their relocation is not frowned upon.

The End Of The Thirty-Year Veteran?

Many may think this is the end of the "lifer." We all know that guy or gal that has been at the company for twenty or thirty years and has risen to an untouchable state—even as a non-performer. No one will fire them, they do not move to new assignments, and the age-old respect for tenure immunizes them against criticism. These dinosaurs are slowly dying out as younger more flexible individuals move through the organization. The lifer will still exist; however, they will be malleable, adventurous, and maintain goals in a manner that meets those of the company.

The beast headed for extinction, holds the status quo, abhors change, and hordes information to maintain their relevance. They take on many shapes and sizes. Some are prima donnas, thinking their views are the end-all and be-all; others are political monsters that twist situations to their advantage. The best action for these people is to ask them to find new positions.

The Contractor Model

Contractors by definition are the ultimate of goal-based contributors. For a contractor, or consultant, to remain viable, they must align their goals to their client's. A good statement of work (SOW) enumerates those goals to ensure alignment. Whatever their engagement, contract, or project, if they are misaligned, their company will eventually fail.

In this respect, the objectives of contractors and employees have merged. Both needs to either seek out companies with mutual goals or change their goals to match the companies. The employee has a lot to learn from the contractor—the SOW. Employees need to clearly understand their company's goals and aspire to met them or move to an internal or external situation that allows them to. This is incumbent on both the employee and the employer to achieve this. The business environment has no room for misalignment.

Loyalty Stills Exists

Loyalty still exists, but, as with so many aspects of business, it just takes a different form and it will keep changing as the world around us changes. I doubt it will reach the state where all jobs are contract based, however, the model will continue to increase. The demands of the younger generation entering the workforce will further enforce this model, as they are more goals oriented and driven by personal gain. Businesses will adapt to this model quickly as it accommodates developing a lean running organization that acquires resources on an as-needed basis. Immutable boomers entrenched in their positions will struggle. They will be the toll of the current economic storm.

Read 11075 times

Related items

  • People vs Process Track Session/Keynote Example

    If you want educational keynote many of our presentations can be keynotes or track sessions. In the example below, the presentation People or Process: Which Impacts Project Success More? is given as a track session.  

    Example People vs Process keynote as a track session

    This session was given at the PMI Sioux Empire Professions Development Day help in Sioux Falls SD on September 9, 2014.

  • Transform Your Project Leadership: For Professionals Leading Projects or Company Initiatives

    Todd Williams contributed Chapter 7, "Leaders Listen." You can buy it on Amazon.

    More coming soon!

  • Filling Execution Gaps: How Executives and Project Managers Turn Corporate Strategy into Successful Projects
    What Filling Execution Gaps Covers

    Filling Execution Gaps

    by Todd C. Williams
    ISBN: 978-1-5015-0640-6
    De G Press (DeGruyter), September 2017

    Project alignment, executive sponsorship, change management, governance, leadership, and common understanding. These six business issues are topics of daily discussions between executives, middle management, and project managers; they are the pivotal problems plaguing transformational leadership. Any one of these six, when improperly addressed, will hex a project's chances for success. And, they do—daily—destroying the ability companies to turn vision into value.

    Check it out on Amazon or the Filling Execution Gaps website

    Without the foundation of a common understanding of goals and core concepts, such as value being critical to success, communication stops and projects fail.

    Without change management, users fail to adopt project deliverables, value is lost, and projects fail.

    Without maintaining alignment between corporate goals and projects, projects miss their value targets and projects fail.

    Without an engaged executive sponsor, scope increases, goals drift, chaos reigns, value is lost, and projects fail.

    Without enough governance, critical connections are not made, steps are ignored, value is overlooked, and projects fail.

    Too much governance slows progress, companies cannot respond to business pressures, value drowns in bureaucracy, and projects fail.

    Without strong leadership defining the vision and value, goals are not set, essential relationships do not form, teams do not develop, essential decisions are not made, and projects fail.

  • Filling Execution Gaps: Building Success-Focused Organizations

    Executives define vision, strategy, and goals to advance the business. Projects enable companies to meet those goals. Between strategy and projects, there is a lot of work to be done—work that lays the foundation for project and operational success. Through experience and research, six common gaps exist in organizations that inhibit project success—an absence of common understanding, disengaged executive sponsors, misalignment with goals, poor change management, ineffective governance, and lackluster leadership.

  • Get Recognized as a Leader: Four Core Leadership Actions

    Leaders make decisions. This requires a core set of actions to gather the best information, hear out the concerns of others, and making a decision that everyone will follow—even if there is not unanimous agreement with the decision. Although there are hundreds of actions leaders must take, there are four core actions that all great leaders do—listening, dialog and discussion, selling a vision, and eliminating blame. This session will discuss those actions in a roundtable format that we call a "What Would You Do?" session. In these sessions, the presenter acts as a moderator spending 10 to 15 minutes per topic working with the audience talking about what the action is, how to best do it, and hearing from the group on how they have carried out the action. This brings significant audience interaction, involvement, and broader education. 

Leave a comment

Filling Execution Gaps

Available Worldwide

Filling Exectution Gaps cover

Filling Execution Gaps is available worldwide. Below are some options.


PG DirectLogo
Limited Time Price $20.99
Amazon logo
Book or Kindle
Flag of the United States Canadian Flag Flag of the United Kingdom Irish Flag Deutsche Flagge
Drapeau Français Bandiera Italiana PRC flag
Japanese flag
Bandera de España
Flag of India
Bandera de México
Bandeira do Brasil
Flag of Australia
Vlag van Nederland
DeG Press Logo
Barnes and Noble Logo
Books a Million Logo
Booktopia Logo
Worldwide: Many other
book sellers worldwide.

Rescue The Problem Project

Internationally acclaimed

Image of RPP

For a signed and personalized copy in the US visit the our eCommerce website.

Amazon logo
Buy it in the United States Buy it in Canada Buy it in the United Kingdom
Buy it in Ireland Buy it in Germany Buy it in France
Buy it in Italy Buy it in the PRC
Buy it in Japan
Book sellers worldwide.

Other's References

More Info on Project Recovery

Tell me More!

Please send me more information
on fixing a failing project.

Upcoming Events