Sunday, 29 May 2011 00:00

Passionately Dispassionate

Rate this item

(1 Vote)

People routinely ask me the question, "What do you do when you find yourself on a project that is a hopeless failure?" It was raised again a few weeks ago in a Focus.com roundtable and then last week in an interview with Andy Kaufman. It only matters if the executives above the project are ignorant to how dire the situation is. It is tricky, trying to convince someone that they have a problem when they refuse to acknowledge the obvious—a tough and politically dangerous sell. The general consensus is "dust of the résumé." However, there is a logical approach to the problem—be logical.

Optimism, Negativism, and Realism

The three "-isms"—optimism, negativism, and realism—must be conquered. The situation is difficult. Optimism is the trait people commonly attribute team players. Blindly promoting how successful a project will be drowns the cries of the realist. Report it as you see it and you run the risk of sounding negative. Management overlooks the pragmatist setting themselves up to be errantly led down a rose laden, but thorny, path. Management has neither the time nor inclination to suss out whether the realist is being objective or confrontational. Therefore, it is incumbent on realist to sell his or her assets. This is a slow process of analyzing, predicting, mitigating, and reporting. In time, people see the value and gravitate toward the realist for comprehensive assessment.

Dispassionate And Committed

The predicament is passion. In the corporate world, passion, zeal, and enthusiasm are virtues. They also beget evangelists, zealots, and bigots—the antithesis objectivity. Brushing aside risk pre-destines operations to devastation from unmitigated menaces and inadequate contingencies. Management hires a hero to ride in for the rescue. Our culture adores heroes, teams are envious, and companies lose.

Dispassionate and committed is the answer—commitment to success and dispassion of the answer. Finding the data that substantiates or refutes solutions to issues will lead you to finding the answer. Presenting management with a concern accompanied with a mitigation or solution is critical to running a successful project. This is the single most important trait for any project manager and is essential to fixing failing projects. There is no place for reaction. Every action must be well conceived and fact based.

**Want to read more?**

Projects take more than managers, they need leaders. Leading is a special set of skills that one needs to hone and develop. We have numerous white papers on the topic. One, Transforming Project Managers Into Project Leaders talks specifically about what a PM must do to become a leader.
Look at the White Paper

Patience Grasshopper

Will the analytical approach make you the instant hero? No. On the contrary, it can make you a pariah. If you want instant fame, this is not your job. Patiently pointing out the hurdles and developing solutions is difficult work. It is far from the ostentatious white knight galloping in on his stead to solve the project's ills.

Recently, I described how I discuss PMOs with customers:

I ask them to tell me what a PMO is. I listen to their attempts to assign traits. "It provides governance," "It monitors projects, measuring their progress consistently so we can compare two dissimilar projects," "It makes sure projects are following the right process," and so forth. Trying to get them to realize that these are solutions, I reframe the question, "What does the acronym mean?" In harmony, I get "project," "program," and "portfolio" followed by "management office." Those three P's define wildly different scope. After people look at themselves for a few moments, I ask, "If we have trouble agreeing on the 'P', then maybe it will help to know what problem you are trying to solve." [...] Eventually someone gets to the point, "Our customer does not like what we are building for them." Now, that is a problem.

People first have to come to the realization that they are asking the wrong question. It is senseless to go against their perception of reality. They must go through the process of discovery and you are their guide. It is the subtlest form of leadership.

Have A Plan

When you find yourself in any situation where you can clearly see the answer and management has not come to that same conclusion, facts are your only way out. Provide a concise description of each problem and the ways to solve them. Remove yourself from the fray scuffling in a religious war over which solution is better and resort to reality. Be the honest broker, never taking sides. Ensure everyone is aware of the solution's strengths and weaknesses. Eventually you will be seen as the real savior of the project. If your case is contrary, resort to rule one—dust off the résumé.

Read 16189 times

Tagged under

Related items

People vs Process Track Session/Keynote Example

<p>Sorry, your browser cannot display frames!</p>

If you want educational keynote many of our presentations can be keynotes or track sessions. In the example below, the presentation People or Process: Which Impacts Project Success More? is given as a track session.

Example People vs Process keynote as a track session

This session was given at the PMI Sioux Empire Professions Development Day help in Sioux Falls SD on September 9, 2014.
Transform Your Project Leadership: For Professionals Leading Projects or Company Initiatives
Todd Williams contributed Chapter 7, "Leaders Listen." You can buy it on Amazon.

More coming soon!
Filling Execution Gaps: How Executives and Project Managers Turn Corporate Strategy into Successful Projects

What Filling Execution Gaps Covers

Filling Execution Gaps

by Todd C. Williams
ISBN: 978-1-5015-0640-6
De G Press (DeGruyter), September 2017

Project alignment, executive sponsorship, change management, governance, leadership, and common understanding. These six business issues are topics of daily discussions between executives, middle management, and project managers; they are the pivotal problems plaguing transformational leadership. Any one of these six, when improperly addressed, will hex a project's chances for success. And, they do—daily—destroying the ability companies to turn vision into value.

Check it out on Amazon or the Filling Execution Gaps website

Without the foundation of a common understanding of goals and core concepts, such as value being critical to success, communication stops and projects fail.

Without change management, users fail to adopt project deliverables, value is lost, and projects fail.

Without maintaining alignment between corporate goals and projects, projects miss their value targets and projects fail.

Without an engaged executive sponsor, scope increases, goals drift, chaos reigns, value is lost, and projects fail.

Without enough governance, critical connections are not made, steps are ignored, value is overlooked, and projects fail.

Too much governance slows progress, companies cannot respond to business pressures, value drowns in bureaucracy, and projects fail.

Without strong leadership defining the vision and value, goals are not set, essential relationships do not form, teams do not develop, essential decisions are not made, and projects fail.
Filling Execution Gaps: Building Success-Focused Organizations

Executives define vision, strategy, and goals to advance the business. Projects enable companies to meet those goals. Between strategy and projects, there is a lot of work to be done—work that lays the foundation for project and operational success. Through experience and research, six common gaps exist in organizations that inhibit project success—an absence of common understanding, disengaged executive sponsors, misalignment with goals, poor change management, ineffective governance, and lackluster leadership.
Get Recognized as a Leader: Four Core Leadership Actions

Leaders make decisions. This requires a core set of actions to gather the best information, hear out the concerns of others, and making a decision that everyone will follow—even if there is not unanimous agreement with the decision. Although there are hundreds of actions leaders must take, there are four core actions that all great leaders do—listening, dialog and discussion, selling a vision, and eliminating blame. This session will discuss those actions in a roundtable format that we call a "What Would You Do?" session. In these sessions, the presenter acts as a moderator spending 10 to 15 minutes per topic working with the audience talking about what the action is, how to best do it, and hearing from the group on how they have carried out the action. This brings significant audience interaction, involvement, and broader education.