Sunday, 12 June 2011 00:00

Decision Makers, Shakers, and Fakers

Rate this item

(0 votes)

Got 'Tude?

Decisions, deshmisions, what is the big deal? Anyone can make a decision! Hardly. After years of working with ineffective initiatives and consternated companies, I have a healthy respect for the D-word. It is all about the seven 'tudes—ineptitude, attitude, fortitude, altitude, aptitude, incertitude, and vicissitude. Some organizations obtrude the 'tude in which they are imbued, while others are denude of a common 'tude.

Ineptitude

The saddest of decision failures is ineptitude. It is rarely unique to the rank and file and, since ignorance rarely needs companions, has well-paid company throughout the hierarchy. In this model, indecision is rooted in the inability to comprehend complexity and decisions are made with forethought, sincerity, and blissful ignorance. To the amazement of the bewildered maker, the results are disastrous.

Attitude

The heart of the decision style is an entertaining reflection of the decision-maker's personality. An acquaintance, with a name something like Tony Giovanni (not his real name, but with enough similarity for you to get the point), once boisterously announced, "I use the Sicilian style of decision making." A few people chuckled and no one questioned the meaning of the statement or any of his decisions.

The autocratic style ranges from the benevolent to oppressive dictator. Your alignment with his or her declaration shapes your view of which end the scale the leader lies.

Consultative managers treating teams as egalitarian societies are slow to the conclusion, but infrequently encounter difficulties rallying the team to support the direction.

Fortitude

Flip-flop, waffle, or waiver, whatever you call it, it is a decision's death. Even the best decision needs a manager with the gumption to stay the course and inspire the team to continue. Few decisions are easy and most are missing the band of pompom laden cheerleaders supporting the direction. The decision maker must have fortitude and tirelessly rally the troops and maintain direction.

Altitude

The common belief is that the further up the hierarchy the easier it is set direction and make a decision. Newly promoted managers are often paralyzed by their distance from the details, relying on data developed and understood by others. Title does not preclude ignorance, ineptitude, or indecision.

Aptitude

Experiential knowledge is superior, but we cannot be experts in everything, especially in fast-paced business environments that change on a moment's notice. Leaders must delegate and divorce themselves from the details and glean the minimal morsels of knowledge to make the right decision. The ability to learn, to adapt, have vicissitude, is crucial in coming to quick and accurate conclusions.

Incertitude

Lack of certainty or weak executive direction lead to inaction—the decision to do nothing results in floating rudderless in the sea of societal whim. The business is left bouncing and bobbing until the nausea drives everyone retching toward the rails looking for the first opportunity terra firma.

Vicissitude

Morphic, malleable, and mutable are key traits of remarkable teams, leaders, and companies. Adaptive decisions, agile management, nimble teams, and superlative communications are the ingredients that allow companies to adjust rapidly to the future's needs.

What is your trait?

Ideally, living in the range between vicissitude and certitude, open and agreeable to change, yet knowing when to set direction is the answer. People do not need to agree with the decision; they need to agree to follow it. Shortly after joining any project, I tell a little story. "There are only two types of people on this project—those of that will love me and those of you that won't. No one will be in the middle ground; although, some of you will, on occasion, transverse that chasm... sometimes multiple times in a single day."

Now it is your turn, tell us your decision-making style, how it serves you, and the ways it inspires the ones around you.

Read 17927 times

Tagged under

Related items

People vs Process Track Session/Keynote Example

<p>Sorry, your browser cannot display frames!</p>

If you want educational keynote many of our presentations can be keynotes or track sessions. In the example below, the presentation People or Process: Which Impacts Project Success More? is given as a track session.

Example People vs Process keynote as a track session

This session was given at the PMI Sioux Empire Professions Development Day help in Sioux Falls SD on September 9, 2014.
Transform Your Project Leadership: For Professionals Leading Projects or Company Initiatives
Todd Williams contributed Chapter 7, "Leaders Listen." You can buy it on Amazon.

More coming soon!
Filling Execution Gaps: How Executives and Project Managers Turn Corporate Strategy into Successful Projects

What Filling Execution Gaps Covers

Filling Execution Gaps

by Todd C. Williams
ISBN: 978-1-5015-0640-6
De G Press (DeGruyter), September 2017

Project alignment, executive sponsorship, change management, governance, leadership, and common understanding. These six business issues are topics of daily discussions between executives, middle management, and project managers; they are the pivotal problems plaguing transformational leadership. Any one of these six, when improperly addressed, will hex a project's chances for success. And, they do—daily—destroying the ability companies to turn vision into value.

Check it out on Amazon or the Filling Execution Gaps website

Without the foundation of a common understanding of goals and core concepts, such as value being critical to success, communication stops and projects fail.

Without change management, users fail to adopt project deliverables, value is lost, and projects fail.

Without maintaining alignment between corporate goals and projects, projects miss their value targets and projects fail.

Without an engaged executive sponsor, scope increases, goals drift, chaos reigns, value is lost, and projects fail.

Without enough governance, critical connections are not made, steps are ignored, value is overlooked, and projects fail.

Too much governance slows progress, companies cannot respond to business pressures, value drowns in bureaucracy, and projects fail.

Without strong leadership defining the vision and value, goals are not set, essential relationships do not form, teams do not develop, essential decisions are not made, and projects fail.
Filling Execution Gaps: Building Success-Focused Organizations

Executives define vision, strategy, and goals to advance the business. Projects enable companies to meet those goals. Between strategy and projects, there is a lot of work to be done—work that lays the foundation for project and operational success. Through experience and research, six common gaps exist in organizations that inhibit project success—an absence of common understanding, disengaged executive sponsors, misalignment with goals, poor change management, ineffective governance, and lackluster leadership.
Get Recognized as a Leader: Four Core Leadership Actions

Leaders make decisions. This requires a core set of actions to gather the best information, hear out the concerns of others, and making a decision that everyone will follow—even if there is not unanimous agreement with the decision. Although there are hundreds of actions leaders must take, there are four core actions that all great leaders do—listening, dialog and discussion, selling a vision, and eliminating blame. This session will discuss those actions in a roundtable format that we call a "What Would You Do?" session. In these sessions, the presenter acts as a moderator spending 10 to 15 minutes per topic working with the audience talking about what the action is, how to best do it, and hearing from the group on how they have carried out the action. This brings significant audience interaction, involvement, and broader education.