Sunday, 15 April 2012 00:00

Changing the World One Project at a Time

Rate this item
(0 votes)

Image of impossible road sign

Change is difficult. Regardless of who you are, it is tough. Recently, I challenged readers of this blog to improve how they tie their shoes. I can confidently wager that a large majority have stayed with their old habits. It takes significant force to reprogram out brains, affect the cultural inertia, and gain acceptance to change, tolerance of occasional mistakes, and, eventually, achieve an organization steeped in transformational principles. Nowhere is it more apparent than when delivering projects that alter the way people perform daily tasks. The reason is that, all too often, the goal is to deliver the project; it is someone else's job to gain adoption.

We Work in Systems

Recently, I read a white paper by Deanne Earle entitled Principles for Intelligent Transition, which nicely underscores this point. She summarizes the issue in a sentence, "[our teams] deliver a good project but can forget what has to happen in business operations once the project is over." This is a result of the errant view that the envelope of the project's methodology insulates the team from the rest of the organization. Nothing could be further from the truth. Projects are a disruptive force in a larger system. Even with the best preparations, too often they are dropped on users in an immediate and abrupt fashion. The recipients react to the change in a multitude of ways—some adopt, some adapt, and others simply reject.

A few years ago, I was privy to a project to integrate a number of subsidiaries into an acquiring company. The client missed the need to start the merger by creating a common company culture and now they needed to replace redundant operational systems with the ones used at the head office. There were the usual issues with any software implementation—undocumented corporate processes, minimal inter-departmental test procedures, over-promising vendors, and so forth. The installation was only slightly behind schedule and, otherwise, ran pretty much as planned. Acceptance testing ran well and everyone seemed pleased as the project was completed. Five weeks later, inventory shortages plagued the assembly line. Assembled-unit's shipping dates started to slip. The problem? People were still using the spreadsheets to keep track of parts and sub-assemblies and they refused to enter parts consumption into the new ERP system; hence, inventories dwindled. Some tried to excuse their behavior by claiming how familiar they were with their spreadsheets, while others simply detested cowing to corporate. The culture in the US failed to account for the reaction in their foreign office. In Deanne's article, this is the third of her six principles of transformation.

The Six Principles of Transformation

Averting issues with post-implementation acceptance requires a change in culture. The concepts of doing this are simple; the execution is more of a challenge. Deanne outlines six basic principles in her approach. The Six Intelligent Transition Principles are:

  • Transitioning a project is straightforward.
  • Identifying Opportunities for Transformation.
  • Determining Transition Success.
  • Gathering External Intelligence.
  • Understanding Human Behaviors.
  • Creating an Intelligent Transition Plan.

Change With Direction

The most critical of these principles are identifying the opportunities and defining transition success. This is where an organization's leadership and innovative nature play the largest role. It is impossible to change if issues cannot be identified; and, nothing completes unless there is a defined goal. These are the mission and the vision; the start and the end; the goalposts for the organization's transformation. They must be clearly defined and widely disseminated. History is laced with stories of inadequately defined and misguided implementations that ignored these principles.

The Rest of the Story

American radio broadcaster Paul Harvey coined the phrase "And now for the rest of the story" for his trademark radio show that would highlight little known facts about historical events. Project deliveries that call themselves complete upon implementation without looking at the adoption, truncate the project's true story. It only takes a quick retrospective to find a multitude of shortsighted implementations failing to define the transformational requirements adequately for successful acceptance. The rest of the story is the effort required to, as Deanne says, "Alter, Transform, and Integrate." Pay the price during the project or suffer the greater expense as it ends up in the anecdotal history of after-the-fact troubles. I suggest you read her white paper.

Read 11521 times

Related items

  • People vs Process Track Session/Keynote Example

    If you want educational keynote many of our presentations can be keynotes or track sessions. In the example below, the presentation People or Process: Which Impacts Project Success More? is given as a track session.  

    Example People vs Process keynote as a track session

    This session was given at the PMI Sioux Empire Professions Development Day help in Sioux Falls SD on September 9, 2014.

  • Transform Your Project Leadership: For Professionals Leading Projects or Company Initiatives

    Todd Williams contributed Chapter 7, "Leaders Listen." You can buy it on Amazon.

    More coming soon!

  • Filling Execution Gaps: How Executives and Project Managers Turn Corporate Strategy into Successful Projects
    What Filling Execution Gaps Covers

    Filling Execution Gaps

    by Todd C. Williams
    ISBN: 978-1-5015-0640-6
    De G Press (DeGruyter), September 2017

    Project alignment, executive sponsorship, change management, governance, leadership, and common understanding. These six business issues are topics of daily discussions between executives, middle management, and project managers; they are the pivotal problems plaguing transformational leadership. Any one of these six, when improperly addressed, will hex a project's chances for success. And, they do—daily—destroying the ability companies to turn vision into value.

    Check it out on Amazon or the Filling Execution Gaps website

    Without the foundation of a common understanding of goals and core concepts, such as value being critical to success, communication stops and projects fail.

    Without change management, users fail to adopt project deliverables, value is lost, and projects fail.

    Without maintaining alignment between corporate goals and projects, projects miss their value targets and projects fail.

    Without an engaged executive sponsor, scope increases, goals drift, chaos reigns, value is lost, and projects fail.

    Without enough governance, critical connections are not made, steps are ignored, value is overlooked, and projects fail.

    Too much governance slows progress, companies cannot respond to business pressures, value drowns in bureaucracy, and projects fail.

    Without strong leadership defining the vision and value, goals are not set, essential relationships do not form, teams do not develop, essential decisions are not made, and projects fail.

  • Filling Execution Gaps: Building Success-Focused Organizations

    Executives define vision, strategy, and goals to advance the business. Projects enable companies to meet those goals. Between strategy and projects, there is a lot of work to be done—work that lays the foundation for project and operational success. Through experience and research, six common gaps exist in organizations that inhibit project success—an absence of common understanding, disengaged executive sponsors, misalignment with goals, poor change management, ineffective governance, and lackluster leadership.

  • Get Recognized as a Leader: Four Core Leadership Actions

    Leaders make decisions. This requires a core set of actions to gather the best information, hear out the concerns of others, and making a decision that everyone will follow—even if there is not unanimous agreement with the decision. Although there are hundreds of actions leaders must take, there are four core actions that all great leaders do—listening, dialog and discussion, selling a vision, and eliminating blame. This session will discuss those actions in a roundtable format that we call a "What Would You Do?" session. In these sessions, the presenter acts as a moderator spending 10 to 15 minutes per topic working with the audience talking about what the action is, how to best do it, and hearing from the group on how they have carried out the action. This brings significant audience interaction, involvement, and broader education. 

Leave a comment

Filling Execution Gaps

Available Worldwide

Filling Exectution Gaps cover

Filling Execution Gaps is available worldwide. Below are some options.


PG DirectLogo
Limited Time Price $20.99
Amazon logo
Book or Kindle
Flag of the United States Canadian Flag Flag of the United Kingdom Irish Flag Deutsche Flagge
Drapeau Français Bandiera Italiana PRC flag
Japanese flag
Bandera de España
Flag of India
Bandera de México
Bandeira do Brasil
Flag of Australia
Vlag van Nederland
DeG Press Logo
Barnes and Noble Logo
Books a Million Logo
Booktopia Logo
Worldwide: Many other
book sellers worldwide.

Rescue The Problem Project

Internationally acclaimed

Image of RPP

For a signed and personalized copy in the US visit the our eCommerce website.

Amazon logo
Buy it in the United States Buy it in Canada Buy it in the United Kingdom
Buy it in Ireland Buy it in Germany Buy it in France
Buy it in Italy Buy it in the PRC
Buy it in Japan
Book sellers worldwide.

Other's References

More Info on Project Recovery

Tell me More!

Please send me more information
on fixing a failing project.

Upcoming Events